Petroplex News

WASHINGTON, DC — Rep. August Pfluger (R-TX) has joined House Majority Leader Steve Scalise (R-La.) and Senator Ted Cruz (R-Texas) in filing a Supreme Court amicus brief in the case Donald J. Trump v. Norma Anderson, et al. The case revolves around whether former President Donald Trump should remain on the ballot in the State of Colorado, after the Colorado Supreme Court ruled that he should be removed, despite being the current frontrunner for the Republican Party’s presidential candidate.

In their brief, Leader Scalise, Sen. Cruz, and their colleagues argue that the Colorado Supreme Court’s decision infringes upon the prerogatives of members of Congress. They assert that the court disregarded the textual and structural limitations designed to ensure that Congress controls the enforcement and removal of a president from office. Furthermore, they claim that the court’s interpretation of "engage in insurrection" is broad and susceptible to abuse against political opponents.

Rep. August Pfluger expressed his strong disagreement with the Colorado Supreme Court's decision, stating, "The Colorado Supreme Court's decision to block former President Trump from the ballot is unconstitutional and takes away the rights of American citizens to vote for their selected candidate. Not only is this a dangerous precedent, but it undermines our election process and democracy." He further emphasized his commitment to upholding the Constitution and the rights of American voters.

A total of 135 House Republicans and 41 Senate Republicans have joined the amicus brief, demonstrating widespread support among the Republican Party for President Trump's appeal. The legislators are urging the U.S. Supreme Court to reverse the Colorado Supreme Court's ruling and allow President Trump to remain on the ballot.

This amicus brief highlights the ongoing legal battle surrounding the eligibility of former President Trump to participate in the electoral process. The Supreme Court's decision in this case will have significant implications for the rights of candidates and the integrity of the election process. It remains to be seen how the Court will rule on this matter, but the arguments presented in the amicus brief will undoubtedly contribute to the ongoing discourse on the role of the judiciary in electoral matters.

To read the full amicus brief, click here.